I found this on the web some time ago. It has served as my guide for publishing articles in various firearms periodicals (is that high-falutin’ enough for ya?)
And to my friends and colleagues in the industry: “Ha ha, only serious!” :-)
Gunrag Writing for Dummies: Nine Easy Steps
Paragraph 1: Quick synopsis of the history of the gunmaker. Misspellings and artistic license are allowed, and even encouraged here.
Paragraph 2: Glowing report, in general terms, of other guns of same brand you have owned, and strong hints that this particular gun will be better than all the others.
Paragraph 3: Brief description of new gun. Be sure to stress “new” features and “new” materials. The adjectives “space-age” and “mil-spec” are tried and true, and can’t ever be used enough.
Paragraph 4: Pick one feature of the gun, whether it is a decocker, accessory rail, bobbed hammer, or whatever, and write one sentence articulating your dislike about it. Poorly concealed digs at current trends are always useful here. Then, prefacing the next sentence with the words, “Having said that,” proceed to refute everything you just said.
Paragraph 5: Description of your range session. Be sure to give precise details about how cold or hot it was that day, and it is absolutely necessary to do some name-dropping when mentioning your range buddies. If Roscoe Benson or John Lysak are unavailable, it is permissible to use the name of a famous holster maker.
Paragraph 6: When reporting accuracy results, it is paramount to choose only the most obscure and expensive premium ammo you can find. Black Hills MUST be represented, as well. Under no circumstances should you include Winchester white box ammo in the results, even if it is the only ammo that will cycle. Results must be listed in a table. Feel free to use the standard boilerplate table, with results pre-entered. It’s not as if anyone actually reads these tables anyway. If smallest groups are in the 5″ range, drop some strong hints that you were doing speed drills at 50 yards, not benchresting from 7 yards.
Paragraph 7: To describe the functioning of the pistol, you must use either “flawless” or “100%” somewhere in the sentence. If you and your buddies couldn’t get it to work at all, be sure to describe the gun as a “pre-production prototype” and mention that the factory fixed the problem by sending you another gun.
Paragraph 8: Pick another feature or quirk of the gun, and express your dislike of it in ambiguous terms. If accuracy was completely abysmal, play up the “perfect for plinking and informal shooting” angle.
Paragraph 9: Conclude the article by saying that “even if the factory doesn’t fix XYZ, I was still impressed enough with the gun that I bought the sample for my personal collection.”

Lance
Jul 22, 2010 @ 07:49:35
Great article!
I remember an old magazine (I actually can’t even call it that, as it was only about 20 pages folded and stapled) called “Gun Tests”. No ads, totally unbiased. These guys would tell you if the gun was crap.
In one review they took a paper cup and stapled it to the brim of a hat to catch the brass, just to illustrate one problem with that particular pistol. Nice picture I’m sure the manufacturer didn’t like.
John Buol
Jul 22, 2010 @ 08:48:25
Gun Tests magazine is still around and is bigger than ever. In fact, I work for the parent company (Belvoir Media Group LLC) as an editor for American Gunsmith. They also run an on-line property called Gun Reports.
Gun Tests magazine
http://www.gun-tests.com
Gun Reports
http://www.gunreports.com/
Fred Vernic
Jul 22, 2010 @ 08:51:49
#1 should probably read, “Only write about guns that are made by manufacturers who advertise in your publication regardless if there are better designs/manufacturers out there.”
Tim Ferrell
Jul 22, 2010 @ 13:51:41
You da man! – Finally, someone calling out gunmag bullshit. How refreshing! I quit reading gun mags a long time ago after owning a few guns I had read about. The one I most enjoyed disliking was was Dick “Never met a gun I didn’t like” Metcalf, always reviewing guns from the manufacturer who owned the ranch/hacienda/continent where he was a guest while performing the review. Well done, but you may lose a couple of friends….
John Buol
Jul 22, 2010 @ 14:10:57
> You da man! – Finally, someone calling out gunmag bullshit. How refreshing!
While this little diatribe is in jest there is a grain of truth. Of course, publishers and writers are ultimately beholden to readers/subscribers and advertisers (not necessarily in that order.) As long as people keep reading/subscribing and companies continue advertising, without some major shake down, the status quo continues.
Ultimately, gun owners get the publications they want and deserve. My two favorite magazines of all time were Gun Games and Performance Shooter because they focused primarily on shooting skill and competition. Both were discontinued long ago so I write for what’s left. If a few of my little ideas make it to print and a couple of people like it, I’m happy.
>> Well done, but you may lose a couple of friends….
Naw. I’m such small potatoes that outside the occasional article nobody in the publishing world pays me much attention and likely never will. The nice thing about being nearly anonymous is even when I stick my foot in my mouth there aren’t many witnesses!