The amount of marksmen within the National Rifle Association has dropped significantly. Why are so few gun owners participating in organized events?
I have a copy of American Rifleman from June 1961. Starting on page 23 of that issue is a detailed report of Operations in 1960. With a membership of 418,000 total, the NRA in 1960 boasted 120,367 classified competitors and the Marksmanship Qualification Program had 374,112 participants. That is, roughly 29% of the membership was classified in formal competition and 90% participated in the MQP. Page 49 of that same issue details a drive for 500,000 members by using the Marksmanship Qualification Program and a push to get every NRA member involved.
Today, with a 4,300,000 members, a ten fold increase, less than 100,000 members are classified shooters (about 2%) and the Marksmanship Qualification Program isn’t even tracked despite advances in information processing and computers.
I would appreciate some insight on this. Why has this dropped so much? What plans, if any, are in place to address this drop off in participation?
Here’s a copy of that issue:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/192788709/NRA-Competitions-Division-stats-1961
Tim Ferrell
Oct 30, 2010 @ 11:17:44
I think it’s because people have less money and free time than they did then. Think about it – do you know anyone whose standard of living is better than that of the early sixties?? I do not. A sad commentary, to be sure. Also, nobody gives a shit about tradition any more, and expects that if they need marksmen, the gov. will send some. I guess they (not me!) have faith the gov. marksmen will know which way to shoot….
-t-
LikeLike
Michael Brem
Oct 30, 2010 @ 11:18:37
Technology made people lazy….that’s the short of it!
LikeLike
Steve Myers
Oct 30, 2010 @ 11:19:27
Easy answer
It is a PITA to find a place to shoot. Add to that the increased expense.
LikeLike
Bill Price
Oct 30, 2010 @ 11:20:36
Hello F.U.N.:
I enjoy your emails and encourage friends to read them.
Ammo has gotten expensive and it’s more difficult to find a place to shoot, so I bought an air rifle. Then another, and another, and another, and another. Pellets are cheap. Many people can shoot indoors or in their yards. I do both.
After less than a year and a half shooting airguns, I came in 9th in the hunter class at the AAFTA (American Airgun Field Target Ass’n) Nationals held this year at Damascus Md. I did this with $269 investment in gun and scope.
Some shooters, however, spend a boatload of money on their guns and scopes.
It’s a great sport, and it can be inexpensive, easy, challenging, and fun. It encourages marksmanship and safe gun handling too.
Perhaps there is some place in your notices to show that adult airguns are a great adjunct to firearms shooting. NRA could help too.
Stay well,
-bp
“A golf course is the willful and deliberate misuse of a perfectly good rifle range.”
LikeLike
bchomor
Oct 30, 2010 @ 11:22:09
* Local gun laws.
* Harassment by law enforcement.
* At one time there were ten or more firing ranges in the Chicago area,
,. . . now I count two (in the suburban area).
* A President who thumbs his nose at the Second Amendment.
* Negative coverage by the media.
* Fewer youths participating.
. . . . . and the list goes on.
LikeLike
JULIE
Oct 30, 2010 @ 11:23:05
Oh, this is good! I can’t wait to see the reply.
LikeLike
Lance Espinosa
Oct 30, 2010 @ 11:25:19
Sic ’em Boo Boo!
LikeLike
High School Shooting Range: 1950s and today | Firearm User Network
May 20, 2015 @ 11:23:03