It’s amazing the silly assumptions people unfamiliar with competitive shooting will make. Ammunition expenditure needed to see improvement in competition shooting is an example. People not involved seem to assume competitive shooters fire hundreds of thousands of rounds each year and any amount less than that means you can’t compete.
Here’s an example:
The top competitors shoot 3/400,000 rds a year thanks to sponsors. The average Joe, thanks to ammo prices, maybe 2000. The average cop/infantryman maybe 1000.
No they don’t. Simply doing the math will reveal the ridiculousness of this claim.
Let’s pretend team shooters Joe Sponsored or Mike Military have unlimited ammunition and don’t have any other responsibilities other than shooting, spending five days a week, 52 weeks a year on the range. That’s 260 range sessions a year. At 300,000 to 400,000 rounds per year, that’s 1,150 to 1,530 rounds per session. No competent marksman will shoot that much every session, five sessions a week, for the entire year, and feel it is showing progress in skill. Sure, plinkers and fools can piss this much ammo away in a day but no skilled shooter will do it daily for a year and claim they’re progressing from it.
This assumes a person can actually manage range time 260 days a year. That assertion is false. The AMU doesn’t spend every duty day on the range and sponsored pro shooters enjoying a full ride (there are very few of them) have other responsibilities for sponsoring companies besides their own training, practice, and match prep.
Consistently getting one or two live sessions a week (say, 60-70 a year) with 100-200 rounds would range between 6,000 to 14,000 rounds each year in practice. Two firm weekly sessions at 200 rounds each is just under 21,000 rounds. Add in ammo for 1-2 matches a month and we might be at 25,000-30,000 rounds a year. Add in dry practice and these figures are closer to what actual, skilled, sponsored/very serious competitors are doing.
With some rare exceptions, not even sponsored shooters in high round count competitive disciplines will be shooting much more than this on an on-going basis. Sure, there might be a big push right before a certain event but I’m talking average, annual expenditure over the course of many years.
A person that understands and applies good training habits, coupled with organized dry practice/training can build a considerable amount of skill with 1,000 – 2,000 rounds a year. Two live sessions a month of 50-100 rounds each is less than 2,400 rounds a year.
Most gun owners would enjoy a HUGE jump in skill with 800 rounds a year. Two regularly-scheduled organized live sessions of 20-50 rounds each month coupled with three regularly-scheduled organized weekly dry sessions.
“Regularly-scheduled” and “organized” is where most people fail. You don’t need 3,000 rounds a year (or 30,000 or 300,000…) to gain substantial improvement. You need to train fundamentals in a regular, on-going, organized fashion. Most gun owners, hunters, tactical, soldiers, Marines and cops will never do this. And their shooting skills will remain at novice levels because of it.
John Tate
Dec 10, 2014 @ 18:47:33
My advice, personal and taken from true experts: for handgun or rifle, 100+ dry fire for every round down range. For rifle, spread the dry fire across all positions.
I’m not sure how to practice sitting and prone rapid fire with the M16 as could be done with the M1 and M14. If anyone has a scheme, please send to John Buol and this website for sharing.
On dry fire, listen to all this Sanderson video, especially at 11:00 minutes to 13:45 minutes:
LikeLike
Colorado Pete
Dec 11, 2014 @ 12:32:03
I managed to make B class in IPSC long ago (late ’90’s) with about three 250 round sessions per month for 10-11 months of the year, shooting about 9-10 matches a year, over the span of a couple of years. Not even with really competitive motivation, just shooting for fun and to improve myself, and with very little dry fire. With a structured and disciplined dry fire routine I could have done it in half the time.
Mr. Tate, I have only a little experience with the M16/AR15, but plenty with the M1, and I’m fairly sure that what works in sitting/prone rapid with the M1/14 should work fine with the 15/16. Between what I’ve experienced and what I’ve watched others do on the highpower line and Appleseed shoots, it’s all the same (except the .223 doesn’t push you around so much as the .30).
LikeLike
John M. Buol Jr.
Dec 11, 2014 @ 15:16:31
It’s amazing what even a little bit of organization and effort can accomplish. This sort of thing is very telling on the state of public sector training and gun owners in general.
Jeff Cooper had first established the drill now known as El Presidente by the late 1960s. By the 1970s, experienced shooters declared that 60 points in 10 seconds (factor of 6) was “par” and the mark of a competent shooter. That’s competent – a mark of skill everyone should achieve – and not unusally good.
USPSA classification data for CM99-11 (El Presidente) indicates a factor of 6 in Production division is C Class, the lowest skill classification that has to be earned.
The speed and accuracy requirements to shoot El Presidente at par is 200-300% better than that required to pass (and sometimes max) police, military, CCW, and similar course standards.
Not counting those with competition or other outside experience. I challenge you to find a unit or department where everyone carrying a pistol can shoot El Pres at par on demand. Hell, I challenge you to find police and military “instructors” that can.
As Colorado Pete points out, even a casual competition shooter can exceed this. Professionals in the armed forces, especially their instructors, should be able to keep up with casual hobbyists.
LikeLike