Low level shooters, and even a number of instructors, have been quoted complaining about being penalized several points during a standards course of fire for missing target center. They say they should have received full value because errant shots landed in the silhouette target’s head or throat area and that would have been effective on a real person.
This is a wrong way to approach this. Paper targets aren’t real adversaries, as the “games’ll getcha killed” crowd likes to point out when bad mouthing practical competition shooting. The desired point of impact (center chest in this case) was known in advance and an errant shot, even if dumb luck put it in the throat, is a MISS by a good 12 inches or more. In a training/practice environment against static targets that aren’t real, this is not good. In the real world you take what you can get. On the range that is NOT a “throat”, it’s a different target or scoring area. Intending to shoot one target (silhouette center), missing it and accidentally hitting a different target (silhouette head) is still a miss.
Try this: Run a tape measure from the center of the target area you intended to hit up to the errant shot in the throat/head. Now, rotate the tape 90 degrees left or right. That same shot error, if pushed left or right instead of straight up, likely missed the entire silhouette. Rewarding such error, even if dumb luck put it on a different target (head/throat scoring area) is rewarding a miss.
This is why I like targets with concentric rings for marksmanship exercises. Too much shot error in ANY direction is the same, lowered result. Silhouettes are good for some types of training, but not for fundamental marksmanship because novices confuse sloppy shooting with “good” hits. For training purposes, we don’t care that a shooter’s flinch or other error pushed the shot towards the head. What matters is the shot missed the intended point of impact. This should be noted so the error can be corrected. Noting this with point totals provides an objective measure, as opposed to some feel-good assessment, and is an easy way to stay organized to help track if improvements are being made. The same course can be revisited and a higher score indicates the shooter is improving the skills tested by that course.
More here:
http://themoatgroup.us/post/63401312332/well-at-least-i-hit-the-silhoutte-still-a-hit
Colorado Pete
Dec 25, 2014 @ 13:41:39
In the real world, dumb luck works both ways….
LikeLike
John M. Buol Jr.
Dec 25, 2014 @ 18:15:13
Aye. And relying on dumb luck is just dumb.
LikeLike
John Tate
Mar 30, 2015 @ 16:30:44
I want to thank you for this. This subject happens to be one of my concerns with the NM qualification targets. The address linked below should render a page of NM qual targets sold by http://www.letargets.com.
The female target gives the best representation of the NM “coke bottle,” also called the “schmu.” The problem is just as the article and the link to the Moat Group page describe: a shooter can completely miss his aiming zone and still get credit for a hit. I don’t believe this is good for handgun or rifle practice or for tactical drills; maybe it’s OK for shotgun as it helps represent “scatter gun” pattern dispersion characteristics where luck really is a factor.
Second, I want to thank you for all the interesting, educational and inspiring articles and video links you’ve sent out in the past year. GOOD STUFF that, if read and studied and practiced, will make the street a safer place for police and citizens alike.
Third, Army did really well this year against Navy. If the trend continues, next year may be “the” year. You see, my daughter, Maria, is now a “butter bar” in USAR, married to an active USA 1LT (airborne ranger), so I have to at least give lip service to cheering for Army too.
LikeLike
New Mexico Firearms Qualification Standards and Scoring | Firearm User Network
Jan 10, 2016 @ 07:09:25