The Value of Competition: What Weightlifters Know That the Hippies Didn’t
by Dresdin Archibald
http://breakingmuscle.com/olympic-weightlifting/the-value-of-competition-what-weightlifters-know-that-the-hippies-didnt
At various times during my active weightlifting career I was asked why I competed. What could I possibly get out of it? Months of hard work culminated by just six lifts in a competition, and no way to argue with the results on the scoreboard. The posers of the question were usually non-athletes. While these people may have enjoyed watching and avidly cheering those competing in professional sports, they did not imagine their own lives being enriched by such heady action. Why would this be so?
Majority thought notwithstanding, I always thought that shunning competition was mainly an excuse to avoid coming to terms with your own limitations. By competing you might have to face the fact that you are not as good as you thought you were, and that can be scary. This all was essentially a risk-avoidance gambit on these doubters’ parts. Competition was a dirty word with many then (as it often is today as well).
Training for lifting without entering competition seemed as silly to me as training for football or any other team sport and then not bothering to go to any team try-outs. In that I was no different from most other Olympic lifters. Only in competition can an Olympic lifter satisfy that urge to metaphorically step onto the Coliseum floor and do battle. You have to step on that platform to impress anyone, even yourself.
Now, what about the risks? What if you train hard, enter, and lose? Well, it’s not a what if. It is a when, at least in your novice days and often beyond. There are a lot of good lifters out there, and most started before you did. You have to work your apprenticeship. In weightlifting, coaches have no control over who else may enter a meet, so you have to expect that you may get blown away sometimes. In other competitions you may win easily if no one comes. You will not win every meet you enter, modern self-esteem instilling teaching methods to the contrary. This is true regardless of the sport. Hell, it’s true of life itself.
However, in the event that your opponent has posted a qualifying total a hundred kilos above yours it is not a time to roll up and die or even to quickly withdraw from the meet. No, barring a bomb-out or him suddenly having a heart attack and dying, you are not going to win that one. What you do then is to forget about that individual as an opponent, that day at least.
You then concentrate on the one opponent who will be more fearsome than anyone. You guessed it, that competitor is you. You do have a best competition total or your best gym lifts. The person who lifted those numbers is who you will be competing against this day. You and him (her) are two different people, because competition lifting is way different from gym lifting. In fact, you should see the lifter who did your gym PRs as your opponent, one who is not the same person as you – a different person. You are the lifter on the competition platform. And you must defeat that other lifter.
Weightlifting always comes down to this. You only have one opponent, ever – and that is you and the fears you want to defeat. But you cannot really defeat this opponent lifting in your gym. You can only do it on the competition platform. You win on this day by setting a new personal record.
After the meet you go back to the gym to train for the next meet. You are now the lifter in the gym again. You must now change places and out-lift the one you were in the last meet. Keep doing this, keep out-lifting that other lifter and you will be that frustrating lifter who posts that qualifying total far above all others. Step by step, that is how a career is built. But you need to compete to make it all work.
hubert townsend
Feb 20, 2015 @ 08:52:37
The day I got better was the day an old shooter told me “You don’t have to beat me. You just have to beat yourself.” A very wise old shooter it seems.
LikeLike
John M. Buol Jr.
Feb 20, 2015 @ 11:07:00
Great point. The value of competition is that it encourages training, that is, organization and measurement of incremental skill development. You don’t have to compete for this to occur, but as this article points out, it often doesn’t occur outside of competition. Most people that don’t participate in formal competition claiming to only be interested in personal development almost never develop beyond a novice level. Police, military, CCW, hunters, and tactical school students rarely develop beyond a novice-level introduction. There are rare exceptions of course. Those exceptions end up training in a similar manner as competitors because that is how every skilled human ultimately develops higher level skill.
The mindset necessary to obtain higher level skill development is the exact same mindset needed to excel in a competitive environment, and vice versa. A person that avoids such formal exposure is almost certain to avoid doing the things necessary to develop higher skill.
As pointed out, this competition can be done just by striving for a personal best. This is better than mere participation, including participation in tactical instruction and training. Most tactical “training” is really just instruction (an introduction of ideas and concepts with some hands-on learning.) While this is useful, especially for a novice and/or person in need of a refresher, it ceases to be training beyond a novice-level exposure of a few days introduction.
LikeLike