There are people that wrongly claim there is no use or carry over of skill from competitive events and equipment to “real world” or other places.
Here’s an example of a skilled competitive shooter using a Remington RM380 subcompact .380 pistol shot from concealment.
Here is another top competitive shooter demonstrating with his actual carry gear:
Many of these defensive/tactical classes are a few days long. Is anyone so stupid as to believe a person with well-developed, demonstrably higher skill such as this couldn’t absorb that knowledge as well or better than anyone else taking such a class, especially compared to the novice-level shooters in attendance at such classes?
What makes you certain this or any other competitive shooter hasn’t already learned and studied such skills? Just because a specific tactical idea wasn’t tested or demonstrated in a specific range exercise or competitive event doesn’t mean the competitors aren’t aware of them.
Ryan P. Dyches
Jul 15, 2016 @ 12:05:49
In the immortal words of Matthew Quigley referring to revolvers: ” Said I didn’t have much use for ’em, never said I didn’t know how to use ’em.”
LikeLike
John M. Buol Jr.
Jul 16, 2016 @ 08:33:12
Nice!
LikeLike