Oblivious shooter ignores major problem with weapon, keeps on firing
Oblivious shooter ignores major problem with weapon, keeps on firing
This neatly sums up problems with line dance “training.” I’ve taken a few such courses. In one example, after asking to replace the well-shredded targets so we could better see where shots were going, we were told there was no need to. Gosh, why would one want to know where fired shots end up? As this demonstrates, some folks apparently don’t care.
https://gfycat.com/EllipticalIdenticalEarwig/
Optical sight loose, twisted, and bouncing in the mount. No worries, just keep slamming on that trigger! This is the same sort of guy insisting that participating in formal competition leads to bad habits but participating in “training” like this leads to success.
More:
https://firearmusernetwork.com/whats-wrong-with-defensive-shooting-classes/
Firearm User Network 
Nov 06, 2017 @ 23:41:34
You do realize this is promotional footage from the release of the Springfield Armory Saint rifle, do you?
This was being filmed, so if the shooter stopped, it would not have been just a quick fix; it would have required all aspects of the filming crew to re-setup to recreate the shot.
LikeLike
Nov 07, 2017 @ 05:27:30
>> You do realize this is promotional footage from the release of the Springfield Armory Saint rifle, do you?
Yes, and it was released anyway. That makes it worse. A firearm company paying a crew and arranging to shoot a promotional video.
This sort of thing also happens during “line dance” classes as well.
https://firearmusernetwork.com/tag/qualified-to-teach/
https://firearmusernetwork.com/review-art-of-tactical-carbine-volume-1/
>> This was being filmed, so if the shooter stopped, it would not have been just a quick fix; it would have required all aspects of the filming crew to re-setup to recreate the shot.
Geez, wouldn’t want to inconvenience the crew recording a video promo for a company by needing a second take to get things right. This was likely B-roll footage the editor(s) included in post, meaning that nobody during the shoot thought it important enough to get a second take, everybody in post-production thought it looked fine, and Springfield’s marketing people approved it for release.
The problem wasn’t that it would have been too expensive or inconvenient for a second take. Most likely, nobody noticed or cared to notice. It was released because nobody involved could tell there was a problem. Not the first time this has happened:
LikeLike