The original link was here: http://www.benning.army.mil/mcoe/maneuverconference/ReadAhead/Marksmanship/Training%20How%20to%20Train%20Marksmanship%20Info%20Paper%20v06K.DOCX
However, the Army removed it. I anticipated this and saved a copy:
Shooting Team members have been saying this since about forever ago. I suppose it’s progress that somebody outside of the marksmanship programs finally noticed as well.

Note the authors of this paper failed to mention the US Army Reserve Marksmanship Training and Competitive Program (who largely staffed the Small Arms Readiness Group back when it used to be effective and relevant), the National Guard Marksmanship Training Center, the All Guard Team, and the Guard’s state-level Small Arms Readiness Training Sections.
These exclusions are especially sad because the NGMTU, state-level SARTS, Guard and Reserve teams are officially declared by published military regulations. Most of the programs listed under paragraph 2d. are not.
I’d point out these exclusions just emphasize the paper’s point as even the authors of this document citing vast ignorance of effective marksmanship training are themselves ignorant of effective marksmanship programs throughout the Department of Army.
5 February 2014
INFORMATION PAPER
Subject: Lack of Institutional Training for Leaders on How to Instruct Marksmanship
1. Purpose. To provide the current status
2. Facts. There is no current training available within the institutional base that instructs leaders specifically on “how to” instruct marksmanship. No formal instruction exists today that develops all leaders on how to adequately teach marksmanship skills, firing or engagement techniques, and methods.
a. NCOES. This includes the Noncommissioned Officer Education System (NCOES) or any other course currently offered at the Maneuver Center of Excellence. No course includes instruction on the variety of training aids, devices, simulations, and simulators (TADSS) that support marksmanship instruction, or how to use them effectively to achieve any desired increase in Soldier performance.
b. U.S. Army Drill Sergeant School. The Drill Sergeant School does provide limited instruction on marksmanship training; however, it is tailored to the instruction modules for Initial Entry Training (IET) and is not available to all leaders Army-wide. In an Army Research Institute study, even the Drill Sergeant courseware required additional attention and that “a common theme identified was that many drill sergeants misunderstood parts of rifle marksmanship doctrine and / or inconsistently applied training techniques and procedures” (Army Research Institute, 2011).
c. Several courses, products, and publications have been developed in the past decade to support marksmanship training at the unit level. The Small Arms Weapons Expert (SAWE) course, the Small Arms Integration Book (SAIB), Short Range Marksmanship course, Long Range Marksmanship course, and Small Arms and Optics (SA-O) course, are examples of those previously developed and provided by the MCoE. These items are no longer supported or provided by the MCoE. Other Army organizations have filled the training gaps created by the loss of these items, such as the Army Marksmanship Unit (AMU), the Asymmetric Warfare Group (AWG), and PM Soldier, Sensors, and Lasers (PM SSL) which offer mobile training teams to small groups (10-20 Soldiers per class).
d. Operational and Army Reserve units have subsequently developed their own marksmanship programs to fill these training gaps, particularly as AMU, AWG, and PM SSL cannot meet the training demand. The following organizations have developed or are developing their own marksmanship instruction courseware to alleviate training shortcomings and the expected loss of MTT support by AMU and AWG in the future:
- 10th Mountain Division
- 82nd Airborne Division
- 101st Airborne Division
- 7th Army Training Command (USAREUR)
- Warrior Training Center (WTC, National Guard Bureau)
- Small Arms Readiness Group (US Army Reserves)
These courses vary in design, content, and duration, but each does reference and use FM 3-22.9, Basic Rifle Marksmanship and the specific weapon technical manuals.
e. The MCoE provided a restructured SAWE Program of Instruction (POI) to units as an exportable training package for unit use. This POI can be found on the Warrior University at: https://www.warrioruniversity.army.mil/training-wiki/-/wiki/main/sawe and can be accessed from any government computer (Maneuver Center of Excellence, 2013).
f. During the AEWE analysis in 2012, specific attention was made to the training shortfalls within Army units. “The Army should consider teaching not just marksmanship to its Soldiers, but formally developing marksmanship training skills for its NCOs” (Army Training Evaluation Center, 2012). The report went on to comment that senior Command Sergeants Major “provided an overwhelming support towards relooking at the Army’s training approach…of US Army NCOs and Officers” concerning instructing rifle marksmanship training skills to leaders.
g. In a white paper from the then 197th Brigade Commander, this position was further promoted to “aggressively pursue consolidation of the different marksmanship courses we currently offer to the field under the auspices of the Global War on Terror into one course that produces a Small Arms Master Gunner. This course needs to build upon the basic knowledge all NCOs get from attending IET, the Warrior Leader’s Course, the (then) Basic Noncommissioned Officer’s Course, and other specialized training they receive during the course of their careers” (Gregory C. Kane, 2009).
3. Recommendation: The Maneuver Center of Excellence evaluates its current curriculum structures and their inherent ability to support any additional training hours specifically dedicated to the instruction of how to train marksmanship. This includes:
- NCOA assess feasibility of including additional instruction on small arms training.
- USAIS assess feasibility of implementing stand-alone functional training course that is specifically geared to certification of instructors at Home Station for small arms weapons, optics, and illuminators.
- NCOA inquire with the Sergeants Major Academy for the feasibility to incorporate small arms instructor training within the Warrior Leader’s Course.
Stephen Krivitsky/AZTD-TDD/6-1828
APPROVED BY: COL Richard Timmons
Bibliography
Army Research Institute. (2011). Research Product 2011-07, Rifle Marksmanship Diagnostic and Training Guide. Fort Benning: Army Research Institute (ARI).
Army Training Evaluation Center. (2012). Analysis Report for the Army Expeditionary Warrior Experiment (AEWE) – Bold Quest 2012. Fort Benning: U.S. Army.
Ellison IV, M. I. (2005). Current Inadequacy of Small Arms Training for all Military Occupational Specialties in the Conventional Army. Fort Leavenworth: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.
https://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p4013coll2/id/346/
Gregory C. Kane, C. (2009). Forging a Coordinated Small Arms Training Strategy. Fort Benning: 197th Brigade.
Maneuver Center of Excellence. (2013). Small Arms Weapons Expert – Training and Educational Material. Retrieved FEB 03, 2014, from Warrior University: https://www.warrioruniversity.army.mil/training-wiki/-/wiki/main/sawe
Maneuver Center of Excellence, Directorate of Training and Doctrine. (2011). Analysis of Alternatives, Live Fire Training Strategies, Task 9. Fort Benning: Maneuver Center of Excellence.
Rand Corporation. (2013). Changing the Army’s Weapons Training strategies to More Efficiently Meet Operational Requirements (RESTRICTED DRAFT). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army.
John Tate
Nov 17, 2014 @ 11:04:50
I admire the honesty in pointing out “the authors of this document citing vast ignorance of effective marksmanship training are themselves ignorant of effective marksmanship programs throughout the Department of Army.” It seems the only ones who care about small arms are the ones carrying them and the ones selling them.
Having shot with and against Guard folks, I know they are top-notch … second only to the Marines ;-)
Stay well – stay in the X.
LikeLike
John M. Buol Jr.
Nov 17, 2014 @ 11:09:02
Despite the issues stated, it is progress that someone of sufficient authority in active Army recognized the problem and attempted to rectify.
All the services have good programs (yes, including the Marines ;), though they receive varying levels of funding, support and attention.
LikeLike
T. Busse
Nov 18, 2014 @ 07:26:08
If my failing memory serves me right, these issues were identified and effectively and efficiently dealt with by a small group of dedicated soldiers at Camp Bullis, TX until they were eventually made irrelevant by indifference by the very people clamoring to become members of this elite and motivated team not because of interest in the mission but because they were non-deployable during a time of war.
T. Busse
SSG, USAR, Retired
LikeLike
John M. Buol Jr.
Nov 18, 2014 @ 09:31:33
@T. Busse
But that was about five years ago and has long been forgotten. This paper and active component conference/think tank that ignored the Guard and Reserve spells out their re-re-re-re-identification of those same previously-identified problems and is the new Next Best Thing.
Also, we made the mistake of attempting to have an idea and solution not blessed by the AMU or the active component.
LikeLike
Parrots or Professors: Training Military Marksmanship Instructors | Firearm User Network
Aug 12, 2015 @ 09:41:55
Marksmanship Master Trainer Course | Firearm User Network
Jan 15, 2016 @ 07:13:42